|
|
Post by Mr. Hockey on Nov 22, 2008 19:40:40 GMT -5
yup, i agree.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carson! on Nov 22, 2008 19:56:09 GMT -5
yeah volchy's "goal". Maybe its just the sens. The same thing happened today against the rangers with foligno. but it was justified when alfie scored a goal that shouldn't have counted.
Oh yeah, and the Habs are playing well against the Bruins half way through the first. Laraque is trying to fight Lucic too!
|
|
|
|
Post by V-HAB on Nov 22, 2008 20:21:44 GMT -5
I hope they fight. I really hate Lucic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Hockey on Nov 22, 2008 20:21:57 GMT -5
i know Lucic is making me mad. I dont blame Laraque for trying.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Hockey on Nov 22, 2008 20:24:44 GMT -5
O and Lucic has a sore hand.
|
|
samk
Minor Pro
& finally the Canadians retired #33 & then traded it to Colorado !
Posts: 240 
|
Post by samk on Nov 22, 2008 22:16:30 GMT -5
*praying*
Please grant me one wish Lord Stanley......
Please put Patrick Roy in goals for the shoot out !!!!!!!!!!!!
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by V-HAB on Nov 22, 2008 22:27:40 GMT -5
Bah, they lost it. Oh well, I'll take the point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carson! on Nov 22, 2008 23:59:34 GMT -5
yup they're fortunate that the got that late goal in the third! oh yeah and i was checking the standings and ottawa is only 7 points behind the habs with 1 game at hand. So watch out! because the sens are looking better, and the habs, well... BTW! im not saying that ottawa is going to pass montreal in the standings im just saying they're closer than i thought! well...they might pass them...just maybe...just....maybe  |
|
|
|
Post by V-HAB on Nov 23, 2008 13:25:57 GMT -5
Carson. 7 points is a lot.
And the Sens are looking better? They just snapped a 6 game losing streak. Wow. They are 3-4-3 in their last 10. That's not really looking good to me.
Oh, and it's Montreal that has the game on hand, not Ottawa. So that's not a good thing for the Sens.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Hockey on Nov 23, 2008 14:53:05 GMT -5
i found that the last 2 games that Montreal played great. they are coming back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carson! on Nov 23, 2008 16:07:36 GMT -5
im just saying, against the Rangers they outplayed them, and Lundqvist kept the rangers in the game. It goes to the shoot-out. Montreal was out played by Ottawa, one bad call and it goes to the shoot-out, something that Ottawa sucks in. Then Ottawa plays the Rangers again, no Lundqvist, Ottawa wins 4-1.
Three great games is what I call looking better.
I wrote the Habs have 1 game at hand, you must have mis-understood...well, i wrote it wierd, but i mean that Montreal has the game at hand.
|
|
|
|
Post by V-HAB on Nov 23, 2008 16:49:18 GMT -5
I disagree with Ottawa having outplayed Montreal actually. I'd say it was an even matchup that night.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Hockey on Nov 23, 2008 17:15:25 GMT -5
both teams were going back and fourth all game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carson! on Nov 24, 2008 0:31:28 GMT -5
The Habs vs Sens game was fairly even .If that. I still give Ottawa more credit for working harder and winning more battles. Montreals was 5th place, Ottawa was 14th. Obviously Montreal wasn't working very hard, or else they would have won that game easily 4-0 again.
|
|
|
|
Post by V-HAB on Nov 24, 2008 12:00:50 GMT -5
You're forgetting that Montreal was in the middle of a slump, and that Ottawa was fighting to come out of one after 5 straight losses. Not to mention home ice advantage for the Sens,
It was a very evenly matched game.
|
|
